Jakarta – The legal counsel team of Joko Widodo-Ma’ruf Amin stressed that he did not want to be dragged into the various propaganda that the legal team pair number 02 Prabowo Subianto-Sandiaga Uno launched.
Propaganda was carried out for example about Ma’ruf Amin’s position in Islamic banks and partner campaign funds 01.
At present, Jokowi’s attorney said he would continue to focus on responding to registered applications, namely applications on May 24, 2019.
“We take care of the developments carefully and carefully. As the saying goes, they dance according to the drums that are beaten by other people,” said Jokowi-Ma’ruf’s attorney team, Yusril Ihza Mahendra shortly after submitting the response file at the MK building, Jakarta, Thursday (06/13/2019).
As is known, in the improvement of the petition submitted by Prabowo-Sandiaga’s attorney on June 10, 2019, the problem was Ma’ruf’s position as the Supervisory Board in two Islamic banks. However, the Court finally only registered the application submitted on May 24, 2019 and the request for repairs on June 10 was only made an attachment.
“We are not provoked by Ma’ruf Amin’s problem whether it is still a sharia employee and others because it cannot be disputed at the Constitutional Court anymore. Also the issue of Jokowi’s campaign funding contributions. It is not a focus, but let it be part of 02 propaganda camp, “Yusril said.
According to Yusril, in the face of the inaugural trial, his side will still be based on the lawsuit filed by the Prabowo camp on May 24, 2019. However, if the Constitutional Court judge also questions the application submitted on June 10, 2019, his party also claims to be ready.
“We know that there has been a recent change in improvement. It has resembled a new application. Although it is still a matter of debate, it depends on whether the judges will be examined on May 24 or after the changes have been made,” Yusril explained.
“Although we will reject this change in accordance with the provisions of the Constitutional Court Act and law that in the event of a presidential election, the request may not be amended. So we will cling to these regulations and hope that the panel of judges will examine the registered application, namely the application Last May 24, 2019. But of course we also don’t stay silent, we review the changes made. We have also prepared. ”
“But our focus is to maintain our establishment of the application that was registered on May 24, which must be used as a check on the case.”